至尊彩票规则|至尊彩票APP

来源：至尊彩票交流群2024-03-26 17:48

至尊彩票规则

国台办：让台胞台企更有获得感和参与民族复兴的自豪感******

　　中新网1月11日电国台办发言人马晓光11日表示，新的一年，我们将继续致力促进两岸经济交流合作、深化两岸融合发展，完善增进台湾同胞福祉的制度和政策，让台胞台企更有获得感和参与民族复兴的自豪感。

　　11日国台办举行例行新闻发布会，有记者问，请发言人介绍2022年两岸经济交流合作情况，有哪些主要特点？对2023年两岸经济交流与合作有何预期？

　　马晓光表示，2022年，我们克服新冠疫情和民进党当局阻挠限制等不利影响，突出“以通促融、以惠促融、以情促融”，扎实推进两岸经济交流合作。

　　马晓光指出，一是在两岸同胞共同努力下，两岸经贸往来克难前行，总体保持稳定。据海关总署统计，2022年1至11月，两岸贸易总额2943.9亿美元，与2021年同期基本持平。其中大陆对台出口753.2亿美元，同比增长6.6%；自台进口2190.7亿美元，同比减少2.9%。据商务部统计，2022年1至11月，大陆新批准台资项目(含经第三地转投资)5470个，实际利用台资金额19.2亿美元。两岸产业合作不断深化，产业链供应链基本稳固。

　　二是积极协助大陆台企克服疫情影响，保持生产经营总体稳定。各地不断优化涉台营商环境，落实落细台胞台企同等待遇，送政策、送服务上门，全力为台商台企办实事、做好事、解难事。出台扩大申请设立个体工商户相关政策，大幅降低台湾同胞特别是基层民众、青年群体到大陆创业门槛，获得台胞台青热烈响应。台企首度参与中国工业大奖评选，冠捷电子公司等8家(个)台资企业和项目分获第七届中国工业大奖、表彰奖、提名奖，大陆台企获得感、荣誉感显著增强。

　　三是支持台胞台企参与乡村振兴和农业高质量发展。进一步落实落细“农林22条措施”，支持福建漳平台创园成功创建国家现代农业产业园，支持福建三明创建海峡两岸乡村融合发展试验区，推进设立海峡两岸乡村振兴合作基地。目前在大陆农业及食品业领域投资的台企累计已超过1万家。

　　四是大力支持台商台企参与国家发展战略，台商投资结构更加优化。有关省市和两岸企业家峰会等创新方式，举办形式多样的涉台经贸活动，为台商台企参加国家区域重大战略、区域协调发展战略搭建平台，提供商机。积极支持福建探索海峡两岸融合发展新路，引导、支持台资企业向中西部地区有序转移、参与“一带一路”建设。支持台商台企利用进博会、各类展销会、电商平台等拓展内需市场。支持优质台企上市，深化两岸金融合作。2022年共有10家台企在大陆A股上市，在大陆上市台企现增至57家。

　　马晓光强调，新的一年，我们将继续致力促进两岸经济交流合作、深化两岸融合发展，完善增进台湾同胞福祉的制度和政策，让台胞台企更有获得感和参与民族复兴的自豪感。

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.